Most compliance engagements produce a report and move on. EasyCloudify™engagements prove your controls survive real exploitation — then build the documentation trail your QSA, auditor, or regulator actually requires.
12
Frameworks mapped
QSA-ready
Evidence packages
SOC 2
Type II attested
31%
of 2026 breaches arose from exploited vulnerabilities
Verizon DBIR 2026
74%
of known exploitable vulnerabilities left unvalidated and unfixed
Verizon DBIR 2026
$10.22M
average cost of a U.S. data breach in 2025
IBM Cost of a Data Breach 2025
Every EasyCloudify™ compliance engagement aligns to the specific testing methodology, evidence standard, and documentation format your framework requires.
Requirement 11.4 demands a documented penetration testing methodology, manual internal and external testing, CDE segmentation validation, and remediation retesting.
We validate
You receive
Documented scope, methodology, exploitation evidence, and retest verification your QSA can stand behind.
Cadence: Annually for merchants. Segmentation testing every 6 months for service providers.
§164.308(a)(1)(ii)(A) risk analysis and §164.308(a)(8) periodic evaluation under the Security Rule require technical testing that surfaces genuine ePHI exposure.
We validate
You receive
Technical risk evidence for risk management programs and Security Rule compliance documentation.
Cadence: Annually and after significant infrastructure or application changes.
Security Trust Services Criteria requires technical testing evidence that your controls actually operate effectively — not just that they are documented.
We validate
You receive
Exploitation evidence your SOC 2 auditors accept as proof controls work as designed.
Cadence: Annually, aligned to your SOC 2 examination cycle.
16 CFR 314.4(d) requires financial institutions to implement periodic penetration testing and vulnerability assessments as part of their customer information protection program.
We validate
You receive
Periodic testing documentation aligned to Safeguards Rule compliance program expectations.
Cadence: Annually as required by the FTC Safeguards Rule.
NIST SP 800-171 practice requirements and CMMC 2.0 Level 2/3 security objectives require DoD contractors to demonstrate control effectiveness across all CUI-handling environments.
We validate
You receive
Assessment evidence aligned to CMMC 2.0 practices and NIST SP 800-171, supporting your documentation package.
Cadence: Aligned to your CMMC assessment cycle and after significant environment changes.
ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Annex A 8.8 requires ongoing management of technical vulnerabilities across all information assets within your ISMS scope.
We validate
You receive
Technical testing evidence supporting ISMS vulnerability management controls for surveillance and recertification audits.
Cadence: Annually and aligned to your ISMS surveillance and recertification schedule.
Article 32(1)(d) requires organisations to implement a process for regularly testing, assessing, and evaluating the effectiveness of technical and organisational security measures.
We validate
You receive
Evidence of regular technical testing proportionate to your processing activities, fulfilling Article 32 requirements.
Cadence: Regular intervals proportionate to the risk profile of your processing activities.
FedRAMP Penetration Test Guidance mandates testing of all required attack vectors for cloud service providers seeking or maintaining Authorization to Operate.
We validate
You receive
Penetration testing documentation formatted for your FedRAMP ATO package and annual continuous monitoring obligations.
Cadence: Annually as required by ATO conditions and continuous monitoring obligations.
Every engagement starts with your framework requirements and ends with documentation that closes the audit loop.
We map your specific regulatory requirements to concrete attack surfaces, define testing boundaries, and issue a signed Rules of Engagement document before any work begins.
Senior offensive security specialists execute manual attacks to validate which vulnerabilities an attacker can actually exploit — going well beyond automated scanner output.
Every confirmed finding ships with exploitation proof, attack narrative, business impact, and remediation guidance formatted to your framework's documentation standard.
After your team addresses findings, we retest and document that corrections hold — closing the compliance loop with verified evidence, not assumptions.
Clear answers for security teams, compliance officers, QSAs, and engineering stakeholders navigating major regulatory frameworks.
Yes. Requirement 11.4 covers your testing methodology, manual internal and external penetration testing, remediation validation, and segmentation testing where segmentation reduces PCI scope. Merchants test annually; service providers must conduct segmentation testing every six months.
No. Automated scans identify known weaknesses but cannot validate exploitability, chain attack paths, or test business logic. Most frameworks — PCI DSS, HIPAA, SOC 2, GLBA, and CMMC — specifically require manual penetration testing to demonstrate controls hold under real attack conditions.
Every EasyCloudify™ compliance engagement delivers scope documentation, a documented testing methodology, exploitation evidence with screenshots and attack narratives, risk-prioritized findings, remediation guidance, and retest verification — formatted to meet your specific framework's evidence expectations.
Yes. EasyCloudify™ scopes engagements to satisfy multiple frameworks simultaneously where overlapping evidence requirements allow. A single well-scoped engagement can often produce documentation supporting PCI DSS, SOC 2, and ISO 27001 concurrently, reducing cost and testing disruption.
Most scopes run one to two weeks from kickoff to final report delivery. High-complexity environments, multi-location scopes, or combined framework assessments may extend the timeline. We provide a fixed-scope estimate and firm timeline before any work begins.
Yes. Retesting is included for confirmed findings so you close the compliance loop with documented proof that issues were corrected — not just marked resolved in a ticket. PCI DSS Requirement 11.4.4 explicitly requires remediation retesting, and we support that requirement directly.
Start with a scoping call. We'll map your compliance requirements to a testing plan and deliver a fixed-scope estimate before any work begins.